Higher
education in decline, part 2 by Walter Williams
December 15, 2004
Last
week's column discussed the sad and tragic state of affairs
in higher education. According to loads of letters received
in response to that column, it's worse than I thought. Let me
share just a few of them.
One
person wrote that he knows an elementary school teacher and
said, "She believed, until just this past summer, that
the state of Alaska was an island because it is so often shown
as an inset on many U.S. maps, appearing somewhat like an island."
A
professor said that while he was trying to help a student with
a problem, he asked her, "What is 20,000 minus 600?"
He went on to say, "She literally could not answer without
the calculator." He rhetorically questioned, "Should
a person receive a college degree that cannot answer that in
their head?"
An
English professor wrote, "One of the items that I assigned
was a two-page essay that described a favorite vacation or holiday.
One student turned in two pictures drawn with crayon depicting
the beach. When I gave her a failing grade, she was indignant
and said that she put a great deal of work into the pictures.
When I told her that she did not do the assignment and that
she was supposed to write an essay, she said, 'But I don't know
what an essay is!'"
Such
students are academic cripples and don't belong in college in
the first place. Recently released findings of the Program for
International Student Assessment ranked U.S. high-school students
24th out of 29 countries. American 15-year-olds demonstrate
less math proficiency than their counterparts in Hungary and
the Slovak Republic. With those findings, we shouldn't be surprised
by a recent U.S. Department of Education study finding that
nearly half of all college students must take remedial courses
in math and reading. According to National Center for Education
Statistics, in 2000, close to 80 percent of colleges offered
remedial services.
Several
devastating consequences result when colleges admit unprepared
students. First, it lets high schools off the hook by allowing
them to continue to confer fraudulent diplomas. Second, it leads
to a dumbing down of the academic curricula and the creation
of Mickey Mouse courses for students who can't make it in more
challenging courses. Academic departments or professors who
don't dumb down their classes and participate in grade inflation
risk declining enrollment and administrative threats to their
budgets. Finally, hiring faculty to staff remedial courses inflates
college costs to parents and taxpayers.
The
nation's primary and secondary education is a national disgrace
– will we allow our undergraduate education to become
so as well? If we continue down our present course, the answer
is an unambiguous yes. To change course, we need to start examining
the incentive structure that college administrators face.
To
a large extent, college budgets are determined by enrollment
size. More students mean higher budgets and therefore incentive
to admit students unprepared for college. Colleges should not
admit students requiring remedial education. That's not to say
youngsters shouldn't receive remedial education, but let them
get it elsewhere – maybe at the high school that awarded
them a fraudulent diploma.
We
might rethink the financing of higher education, particularly
at government-owned colleges, so as to introduce competition
that might improve quality and drive down costs. High-school
graduates meeting academic criteria for college admission should
be awarded a voucher in the amount of the per capita college
cost paid by state taxpayers. The voucher could be used at any
college, an idea similar to the GI Bill. There was a time when
we could have prevented the K-12 slide to mediocrity, but we
didn't seize the moment. Now's our chance with higher education.
Will we let this moment pass us by?